I passed the bar 😉
Can’t wait to see the full list, hear about everybody else, see the statistics, get sworn in, get a real job, etc.
I passed the bar!
November 16, 2007 by Portland Attorney
I passed the bar 😉
Can’t wait to see the full list, hear about everybody else, see the statistics, get sworn in, get a real job, etc.
I passed the bar!
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 4 Comments »
November 16, 2007 by Portland Attorney
Sitting on my awesome deck overlooking a verdant little mini-canyon tonight, I am surprised at how extraordinarily foggy it is! Crickets chirp in every direction, but you can’t see to the other side… kind of like waiting for those results. And, although it’s gone by pretty fast overall, without any freaking out on my part, I feel certain that Friday will be a long day with a lot of clock-watching.
Today could have gone better, given the absolutely horrible Oregon football upset, but I’m confident that, come tomorrow evening, people will stop and listen when I tell them:
YOU DO NOT NEED BAR/BRI TO PASS THIS EXAM!
Long-live Adaptibar and self-study!
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 1 Comment »
November 15, 2007 by Portland Attorney
Check it out! Despite the fact that individual exam results won’t be available until tomorrow, the State Bar of California has released overall pass rate statistics for the July 2007 exam!
The good news for all you worrywarts is that July 2007 exam-takers passed at a rate of 56.1%, almost 5% higher than the students who sat for July 2006, and almost 20% higher than the students who sat for February 2007 (though it should be noted that in the past 45 years, the overwhelming trend has been for July takers to pass at a significantly higher rate than February takers, and one must go back to 1961 to see an example of when this didn’t happen).
In fact, the 56.1% pass rate is the highest of any California bar exam in the last 6 years. And compared to the last 103 times the California bar exam has been administered (as far back as the State Bar has statistics), the 56.1% pass rate is the 23rd highest in the exam’s history.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged bar exam | 1 Comment »
November 12, 2007 by Portland Attorney
I’m sure right now there are thousands of JDs anxiously awaiting 6pm on Friday. Many, if not most, of them are, sadly, probably petrified. I know this may be difficult advice to take, but I think we all should be optimistic, even excited as Friday approaches.
As for me, personally, I just went on the California Bar website to look up details on a particular attorney, and I suddenly and uncontrollably was overcome with a physically-felt thrill over the fact that, in just a few short days, I’ll be able to find my own name through the Bar’s attorney search function!
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | Leave a Comment »
November 12, 2007 by Portland Attorney
So, many blogs allow authors to see how people have found their blogs. Sometimes it’s bizarre, but often it’s just sad…
Just yesterday, someone found this blog by Googling for “Screen I would see if I fail the California Bar Exam.” What happened to optimism? And for the record, I doubt the screen would be very conspicuous – I have a feeling that the Bar doesn’t set up a page that flashes red and loops an mp3 that says “Hey everybody, I failed the bar exam!”
This sort of pensive speculation reminds me of spring ’04, when people were always wondering what the envelope would look like as law schools sent out their admissions decisions. And now that’s ancient history, for those of us awaiting Friday, at least.
The best part about this blog, however, is that it comes up #2 when you Google “Sometimes you eat the bar.” Being a huge Big Lebowski fan, that really makes my day!
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | Leave a Comment »
November 9, 2007 by Portland Attorney
Seven days and three hours to go!
Does anybody know anything about when/where the big swearing-in ceremonies will be held? And what about simultaneous (or at least same-day) admission to the federal bar in a particular district?
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 1 Comment »
November 2, 2007 by Portland Attorney
So, California Bar Exam results come out in 14 days, 5.5 hours…
At that time, there are going to be a lot of relieved people and just as many miserable people.  And along with finding out your own result, you probably have friends who will be receiving their own results. So, what is the proper etiquette for communicating with those friends during that decisive weekend?
Keep in mind that the complete list will be released on Sunday, so if you’d be entirely satisfied simply by the knowledge of whether a person passed or failed, it may be best to just wait and look at the Sunday list.
For those of you that, due to whatever reason, can not wait, this blog recommends the following:
Good luck!
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 4 Comments »
July 26, 2007 by Portland Attorney
And so, rather quickly, it’s all over.
They say there are three parts to the bar exam – preparing, taking, and waiting for your results…
And they also say that taking it is the easiest, and preparing for it is the second-hardest.
I suppose that means we’ve only just now come to the hardest part of the bar. Hopefully I’ll be able to put it out of my mind as much as possible, and then get good news on November 16, which is 112 days away.
If/when an occasion arises where I begin to doubt myself, I should look back at this, and remember:
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 4 Comments »
July 24, 2007 by Portland Attorney
It’s true that certain Jews who observe Tisha B’av were able to petition the state to allow them to take the bar on Wed/Thurs/Fri rather than starting on Tuesday.
However, the idea that those Jews get to answer the SAME questions that we did today is ludicrous…
So, either the people that think this are really stupid…
Or the State Bar is incredibly stupid…
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 7 Comments »
July 24, 2007 by Portland Attorney
So, here’s what I remember about today’s Essays 1-3
Feel free to post-game in the comments section.
(NOTE: Obviously this is just what I can remember – it’s by no means meant to be exhaustive!)
Question 1: Larry Landlord vs. Tanya Tenant
Written lease for 4-room office suite – no duration specified. Assume 1 year? Landlord promises to supply “essential services.” For 5 1/2 months, numerous occasions where water, heat, electricity, elevator shut off. One entire week in December – no water, no heat, no electricity.
Tanya says “As of Feb 28 I’m out of here.”
Landlord does nothing to find new tenant until April 15, finally has another move in on May 1.
Issue 1 – on what theory might Larry recover for March and April’s rent?
Tanya’s breach of duty to pay rent
Issue 2 – Tanya’s defenses
Landlord’s breach of “essential services” provision
Landlord’s failure to mitigate
Landlord’s frustration of Tanya’s purpose
Question 2: Cold Drink Blender
Named “cold drink blender,” brochure contains statement “perfect for making all your cold drinks” and “do not fill more than 2 inches below top.” Consumer buys one, fills it to top with hot soup, and blends – gets burned by splashing hot soup. Alleges that part of the cause of injuries was Manufacturer’s failure to include a blender lock. Blender lock not required by federal regulations.
Issue 1 – Manuf. moves to dismiss based on Consumer’s misuse
Issue 2 – Manuf. moves to dismiss based on Consumer’s negligence
Issue 3 – Manuf. moves to dismiss based on compliance with federal safety standards
Issue 4 – Retailer moves to dismiss based on its lack of involvement in design process.
Question 3: Mechanic Evidence
Issue 1 – Mechanic’s statement “His brakes are bad – he should get them fixed.”
Issue 2 – Mechanic’s instruction to Helper “Inspected brakes – repair?” and the work order form Helper wrote on.
Issue 3 – Mechanic’s statement to Plaintiff “Your brakes are bad.”
Issue 4 – Plaintiff’s response to Mechanic “I’m not surprised – they felt funny.”
Issue 5 – Bystander’s shout “The sports car ran the red light and hit the truck!”
PERFORMANCE TEST OUTLINE
I thought this was extremely easy.
#1) Substantially Factually Related (if you even make it its own separate header)
#2) The Final Presumption and its Rebuttability
#3) The Ethical Screen
Posted in bar exam | Tagged bar exam | 14 Comments »